<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeler: Grading how each Big Ten team fared in realignment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hawkcentral.com/2010/09/02/keeler-grading-how-each-big-ten-team-fared-in-realignment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hawkcentral.com/2010/09/02/keeler-grading-how-each-big-ten-team-fared-in-realignment/</link>
	<description>powered by the Iowa City Press-Citizen &#38; The Des Moines Register</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepsouthdoug</title>
		<link>http://hawkcentral.com/2010/09/02/keeler-grading-how-each-big-ten-team-fared-in-realignment/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>deepsouthdoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hawkcentral.com/?p=2482#comment-169</guid>
		<description>A for how this alignment might average out to be a more  favorable schedule.  

F for losing Wisky and not having PSU on a more regular basis. 

PU as a protected rival?  The Tupperware Bowl - conference leftovers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A for how this alignment might average out to be a more  favorable schedule.  </p>
<p>F for losing Wisky and not having PSU on a more regular basis. </p>
<p>PU as a protected rival?  The Tupperware Bowl &#8211; conference leftovers!
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_169"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 169 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_169"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarleyHawk</title>
		<link>http://hawkcentral.com/2010/09/02/keeler-grading-how-each-big-ten-team-fared-in-realignment/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>HarleyHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hawkcentral.com/?p=2482#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Losing Penn State &amp; Wisconsin as a yearly on a yearly basis is an A-?

Purdue as a protected rival? 

I&#039;d hate to see what an A+ is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Losing Penn State &amp; Wisconsin as a yearly on a yearly basis is an A-?</p>
<p>Purdue as a protected rival? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d hate to see what an A+ is.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_161"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 161 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_161"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rupertj</title>
		<link>http://hawkcentral.com/2010/09/02/keeler-grading-how-each-big-ten-team-fared-in-realignment/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>rupertj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hawkcentral.com/?p=2482#comment-158</guid>
		<description>So you think Iowa got the best of any team out of this?  And they lost one of their top two rivals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you think Iowa got the best of any team out of this?  And they lost one of their top two rivals?
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_158"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 158 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_158"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

